Written by: Jehad Harb

 

Unexpectedly and earlier than anticipated, U.S. President Donald Trump began his second term by making statements and launching initiatives related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Not only did he intervene directly in brokering the ceasefire between Gaza and Israel, but he also proposed controversial ideas about the displacement of Palestinians from Gaza to neighboring countries or distant nations, with suggestions including Albania, Indonesia, and others. This 'Trump-sphere' initiative—whether a spontaneous idea or a more structured part of the president's thinking—has caused political turmoil in the region and marked a significant departure from the U.S.'s previously declared policies. Specifically, it contradicts the long-standing commitment to a two-state solution in accordance with United Nations Security Council resolutions. These proposals also violate international law, as they amount to ethnic cleansing.

This initiative comes in the immediate aftermath of the Gaza conflict, signaling that the new U.S. administration seeks to seal Israel's military actions with a political victory—something the previous administration had long hoped for but failed to achieve at the outset of the war. The former administration struggled to pressure Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into establishing a clear post-war governance plan for Gaza. In contrast, the proposed displacement of Palestinians, a central element in the ideology of right-wing Israeli groups and the broader Palestinian conflict, marks a new chapter in President Donald Trump's policies. These policies, which began in his first term, include recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moving the U.S. embassy there, acknowledging Israel's annexation of the Golan Heights, and endorsing the "Deal of the Century," which allowed Israel to annex approximately 30% of the West Bank while fragmenting the potential Palestinian state.

In response to this Trumpian approach, the Palestinian national demands require, first and foremost, a unified national position regarding the political program for all Palestinians. This includes adopting a resistance strategy—the "National Strategy for Confrontation with the Israeli Occupation"—that defines the appropriate means and methods in line with Palestinian capabilities, while safeguarding its resources and bolstering its resilience. Additionally, a collaborative action plan must be established to outline the steps for Palestinian political engagement. This should include coordination with Arab nations, particularly Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, as well as regional organizations such as the Arab League, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and the European Union. It should also engage key global powers like China, Russia, and the United Nations.

Secondly, there is a need to establish a national partnership in governance, meaning the formation of a national unity government, regardless of whether its members are technocrats, independents, or affiliated with political parties. The primary objective is to end the division and unify the governing institutions in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, focusing on serving the citizens. This would also enhance the Palestinian people's ability to engage effectively in international discussions on the Palestinian issue. Additionally, it would prioritize the democratic reconstruction of the Palestinian political system, with a clear focus on preparing for general elections as a national priority.

Thirdly, there is a need for a thoughtful and strategic approach regarding the relationship with the new U.S. administration and the Palestinian response to the U.S. president's statements. It is crucial to avoid resorting to the boycott strategy that was employed in 2017. In my opinion, any consideration of reintroducing a boycott should be approached with caution and depth, as it requires clearly defining the actions to be taken, preparing the necessary conditions, and identifying the most effective channels to communicate the Palestinian message to the American public. This also involves engaging with visiting American delegations to Palestine, including representatives from civil society, local governance, members of Congress, and others, while ensuring that the message does not foster animosity toward the American people but instead encourages dialogue and reconciliation.

While boycotting the administration may be a valid response to the arrogance and overreach of its leader, it is essential not to leave the "American" sphere without a Palestinian presence capable of influencing U.S. political structures. At this critical juncture, the battleground within U.S. politics is paramount. This calls for a comprehensive Palestinian strategy across the United States, based on a clear and strategic roadmap that aligns with the nature of U.S. political mechanisms and leverages Palestinian strengths. This includes mobilizing Palestinian and Arab communities, strengthening ties with U.S. civil society organizations, public figures, media, and members of Congress, as well as engaging with state governments and local councils.

It is crucial to formulate a Palestinian message that frames the Palestinian cause and struggle as part of the broader global fight for justice. This message should emphasize how President Trump's policies not only undermine international law and the interests of the American people, but also fuel resentment and anger across the region.